In 2023, workload automation remains a critical technology for managing digital operations. But is Automic Automation still the right solution for your needs?
In this guide, we‘ll compare Automic to the top alternative options and provide insights to help you determine if switching solutions may be right for your organization.
The Growing Importance of Workload Automation
Workload automation acts as the orchestrator of critical business and IT processes across an organization. These tools take over repetitive, manual tasks and provide a centralized system to define, schedule, run and monitor workflows.
According to MarketsandMarkets, the workload automation market will grow from $1.81 billion in 2022 to $3.19 billion by 2027, a CAGR of 12.2%. This growth reflects the widening adoption of automation and digital operations management.
Key drivers include:
- Increasing use of enterprise service management solutions
- Rising need to ensure compliance and business continuity
- Growing complexity of IT environments with cloud, containers, legacy systems
This rapid growth provides an opportunity for organizations to reevaluate existing workload automation solutions. Purpose-built tools can drive greater ROI through improved agility, productivity and scalability.
How Does Automic Automation Compare?
Automic holds a long reputation in workload automation since being founded in 1985. The solution was acquired by Broadcom in 2018 as part of the CA Technologies portfolio.
Automic offers capabilities like job scheduling, event automation, reporting, alerting, and application integrations. But how does it compare against top alternative options for enterprise workload management?
|Tidal Workload Automation||2013||1.5%||4.7/5|
|IBM Workload Automation||1988||5.1%||4.3/5|
*Market share data based on ReportLinker 2021 estimates
**Ratings data compiled from Gartner, G2, Capterra, and other review sites
In this evaluation, we‘ll explore the top six alternatives that compare to Automic based on market presence, reputation, and functionality.
Overview: Automic Automation
Automic Automation resides in the workload automation space for over 30 years. The solution enables organizations to define, schedule, run and monitor automated workflows spanning systems, applications, and platforms both on-premise and in the cloud.
Automic Automation Dashboard – Source
On peer review sites, Automic Automation earns consistently average ratings compared to competitors:
- Gartner: 4.6/5 (3 reviews)
- G2: 4.4/5 (14 reviews)
- PeerSpot: 4.1/5 (13 reviews)
- TrustRadius: 6.8/10 (13 reviews)
Users cite Automic‘s core strengths around:
- Cross-platform support for Windows and Unix-based systems
- Extensive built-in scripting language
- Library of plug-ins and pre-built workflows
- Integrations with common enterprise apps
The most-cited downsides and limitations include:
- File transfer capabilities need improvement
- Debugging and troubleshooting functionality lacks robustness
- Web-based UI suffers performance issues when overloaded
- Customization and flexibility lags other vendors
While Automic delivers on core workload automation capabilities, competitors often outpace it in usability, performance, and support for complex enterprise needs.
Top Automic Alternatives
Based on market presence, reputation, and reviews, the top alternatives to Automic Automation include:
ActiveBatch is considered a leader in workload automation and the top-reviewed solution profiled here. The software offers capabilities like:
- Multi-platform support (Windows, mainframes, Unix, Linux)
- Low code drag and drop designer
- Workload automation and application release automation
- Event-driven automation through integration with monitoring tools
- Single centralized management console with detailed analytics
The solution scales to support the most demanding environments but also provides pre-built integrations and workflows targeted for SMBs.
ActiveBatch Workflow Designer – Source
ActiveBatch ranks highly across review platforms:
- Capterra: 4.8/5 (52 reviews)
- Gartner: 4.3/5 (61 reviews)
- G2: 4.6/5 (171 reviews)
Users praise ActiveBatch for its ease of use, customization, and scalability to support complex workflows and environments.
2. Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs offers a SaaS-based workload automation solution geared towards business users rather than IT staff.
It provides capabilities like:
- Connectors to integrate legacy systems and apps
- Intuitive drag and drop workflow builder
- Schedule management and monitoring
- Load balancing and failover
- Reporting and real-time analytics
RunMyJobs aims to remove IT bottleneck by empowering business teams to build and manage their own workflows and automation.
It garners excellent reviews:
- Capterra: 4.8/5 (33 reviews)
- G2: 4.7/5 (117 reviews)
- PeerSpot: 4.8/5 (19 reviews)
Users highlight the solution‘s ease of use, performance, and ability to integrate disparate systems into automated processes.
3. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
Stonebranch UAC is an enterprise-grade workload automation solution built for complex, distributed environments.
It provides an automation platform with:
- Single centralized console for all workflows
- Drag and drop workflow designer
- Pre-built integrations and automation packs
- Real-time monitoring and drill-down analytics
Stonebranch enables organizations to automate processes across the entire IT stack – from mainframe and legacy to cloud and container workloads.
The solution earns positive marks from users:
- Gartner: 4.7/5 (7 reviews)
- G2: 4.5/5 (74 reviews)
- PeerSpot: 3.8/5 (26 reviews)
Stonebranch is especially popular with large enterprises needing to orchestrate automation across highly complex, hybrid environments.
Other Top Solutions
Some other alternatives worth considering:
Tidal Workload Automation
- Comprehensive automation solution with advanced analytics
- Top ratings from Gartner, G2, and other analysts
- Expertise in mainframe automation and legacy modernization
- Platform-independent solution supporting all environments
- Event-driven automation responds to business events
- Especially popular among SAP enterprise customers
IBM Workload Automation
- Tight integration across IBM systems and Cloud Paks
- Connectors to popular ERPs like SAP
- Supports modern container architectures on RedHat OpenShift
Making the Switch from Automic
When evaluating alternatives to Automic Automation, focus on solutions that can support your specific use cases around:
- Platforms in your environment – mainframes, legacy, cloud, containers, etc.
- Integration needs with business applications, ERPs, databases
- Workflow orchestration complexity – single apps vs. end-to-end processes
- Monitoring, alerting, analytics required
- IT vs business user orientation
Leading options like ActiveBatch, RunMyJobs and Stonebranch often rise to the top because of their flexibility, ease of use and performance.
![Workload Automation Evaluation Criteria](https://i.ibb.co/ 541vQL2/image.png)
Consider conducting in-depth proof of concepts with your own workflows and data for top candidates before deciding to switch. Also assess needs around migration, training and post-deployment support.
With expertise in workload automation and focus on your specific requirements, modern solutions can provide greater agility, productivity and insights compared to legacy options. Now is the time to explore the automation platforms that can drive your digital operations into the future.